Tenant identity from authentication
Tenancy is derived from the credential that authenticated the call. There is no tenant identifier in the request body to spoof, and no cross-tenant read path in the decision runtime.
Compliance-first architecture, stated as architecture. This page separates what is built from what is not, because the difference is the whole point of buying a governance layer.
Regent holds no security or privacy certification at this time. Nothing on this site should be read as certified, accredited, or equivalent to a certification. When a certification exists it will be named here with its scope and date, and not before. UniversalHealthCare.ai is tenant #1 for the controlled trial. First governed traffic is running. Pilot cohort is open.
These are properties of how the system is built, not policies someone promised to follow.
Tenancy is derived from the credential that authenticated the call. There is no tenant identifier in the request body to spoof, and no cross-tenant read path in the decision runtime.
The decision dossier the judgment engine sees and the delivery envelope that carries the address are separate objects. Raw recipient addresses never enter the judgment runtime; the dispatch audit row records the address as asserted by the tenant against a specific request.
Channel credentials, app secrets, provider tokens and tenant API tokens live in the vault. The judgment layer holds no credentials, no raw identifiers and no cross-run state.
The rules that stop a send are pure logic with no IO. They are not a prompt, they are not advisory, and the model cannot argue with them.
A repeated request id with the same content returns the original operation and never acts twice. The guarantee is zero duplicate dispatch authorizations.
When the provider send response is lost, no provider-backed correlation exists. Matching on recipient and timestamp is a heuristic that can support investigation, and it never establishes acceptance. The state stays unknown until a provider-supported identifier resolves it, or an operator resolves it manually.
Append-only and hash-chained with signed checkpoints and an integrity-verification path. Governed redaction and deletion tombstones are part of the model, which is why the property is tamper-evident rather than immutable.
Pre-contract evaluation runs against public website context and fabricated personas. The Guided Eval reads a public website server-side, requires no production integration and no real customer data, and dispatches nothing; any legal or procurement paperwork required by either party is handled separately.
When a crisis flag is present in the accepted request context, the pre-agent hard stop resolves the escalation before the judgment engine is invoked. No outreach is proposed, none is sent, and the named escalation path executes. Non-overridable at decision time. There is no operator bypass.
A short, specific list that gates the first live tenant. It is not shipped yet, and this page will say so until it is.
Access to the judgment workspace restricted to named operators, not a shared team login.
A scheduled deletion job enforcing a hard cap on workflow-run log retention, so the secondary store is bounded rather than indefinite.
This work runs alongside the trial rather than gating its start. Each item is named so a buyer can ask about it specifically.
Reducing what the trace carries to what the evidence model actually needs.
Deletion across the engine, the judgment workspace and backups when a tenant leaves.
A written register of what data moves where, for whom, and under what basis.
Incident handling and credential-revocation procedure, written down and exercised.
Every trial tenant’s live start date is recorded. When the playbook lands, all data created during the trial window is audited and then deleted or redacted per that playbook. The trial period is a labelled window with a scheduled cleanup, not an open-ended hold.
Committed as scope. The timing is a deliberate decision, not an oversight — and stating it plainly is more useful to a compliance officer than a certification badge that does not exist.
Reviewed with specialists per market rather than asserted from a template.
Where data rests, decided with the same specialists.
Processing agreements as documents a counsel can actually sign.
Pursued when the controls behind them exist and can be evidenced. Not before.
Formalised once the register and the deletion machinery are in place.
Pre-contract evaluation runs on synthetic or de-identified data only. That is not a concession — it is how the evaluation is designed.
Where the answer is "not yet", this page says "not yet". Bring the rest to the pilot conversation — the named technical owner and the named escalation owner are part of how a pilot starts.